🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.